Trial reportActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2026
Prior Knowledge Shaped Dutch Parents' Attitudes Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Paediatrics.
Trial report in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimEuropean parental views on artificial intelligence (AI) in paediatrics remain underexplored. This study addressed this gap by examining Dutch parents' attitudes and assessing how prior knowledge and brief educational interventions influenced their acceptance.
methodsDutch parents were recruited through Dynata, a large-scale survey distribution platform. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions varying in the level of information provided about AI in paediatrics. Next, they completed a translated version of the validated Attitudes towards AI in Paediatric Healthcare (AAIH-P) questionnaire. Responses were analysed across seven domains of concern.
resultsA total of 2248 parents participated in the study (54.6% female, median age 36-45). Privacy, quality and accuracy, and shared decision making emerged as key areas of concern. Parents were more accepting of AI in less invasive conditions or when AI served as a supportive tool rather than a decision-maker. While the experimental condition showed no effects, higher self-reported prior knowledge of AI was associated with lower acceptance.
conclusionParental acceptance of AI in paediatrics depended on context, with supportive roles and non-invasive scenarios viewed more favourably. Since greater prior knowledge was associated with lower acceptance, implementation should go beyond technological possibilities and actively address the identified areas of concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.