ArticleAnatomical science international2025
Sternalis or rectus? An analysis of terminological usage based on case reports of the sternalis muscle.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sternalis muscle is a relatively rare anatomical variant that lies superficial to the pectoralis major muscle. In English-language literature, it is commonly referred as "sternalis muscle" or "rectus sternalis." Although the second edition of the Terminologia Anatomica (TA) officially designates "sternalis muscle" as the standard term, terminological inconsistencies persist. This study investigated the actual usage of these terms based on a literature review of previously published case reports. We analyzed 77 articles comprising 92 cases, retrieved through PubMed and Google Scholar, examining the types of terms employed, their frequency, regional distribution, and temporal trends. As per the first and second editions of TA, the terms were categorized into two groups: the S group ("sternalis muscle" or "sternalis") and the R group ("rectus sternalis" or "rectus sternalis muscle"). Our analysis showed that unilateral cases and male patients were more frequently reported. Regionally, the highest number of reports originated from Asia. The frequency of S group usage exceeded that of R group usage by scale factors of 1.6, 2.3, and 3.8 in Asia, Europe and the Middle East, and North America, respectively. Furthermore, S group term usage increased after the release of the first edition of TA (TA1) and stabilized following the release of the second edition (TA2). These findings suggest that the TA-compliant term "sternalis muscle" has become dominant in English-language literature, supporting standardized anatomical nomenclature and facilitating consistent communication among anatomists and clinicians. This framework may also serve as a model for standardizing terminology related to other anatomical variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41212487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.