Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41212446›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025

Hidden signals in the gallbladder: a clinicopathological deep dive into 148 polyps among 11,108 surgeries.

Semra Salimoğlu, Yüksel Doğan, Barış Eker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Semra SalimoğluDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Yüksel DoğanDepartment of General Surgery, Bartın State Hospital, Bartın, Turkey. ydogan49@yahoo.com.tr.
Barış EkerDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimGallbladder polyps (GBPs) are increasingly detected during imaging and often identified incidentally in cholecystectomy specimens. However, management strategies vary, particularly for small, asymptomatic polyps. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, types, and malignant potential of GBPs through pathological examination of cholecystectomy specimens.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 11,108 cholecystectomies performed from January 2014 to January 2024. Histopathologically confirmed GBPs were identified in 148 patients. Data on demographics, comorbidities, imaging, surgical approach, and polyp features were analyzed.

resultsOf 148 patients with GBPs, 77% were female and the median age was 48 years. Hypertension (31.8%) and diabetes (16.9%) were common comorbidities. Preoperative ultrasonography detected polyps in only 33.8% of cases. Most polyps (81.8%) were pedunculated and ≤ 10 mm. Cholesterol polyps accounted for 64.2%, and precancerous/malignant lesions for 19.6%. Multivariable analysis showed sessile morphology (OR: 4.2, p = 0.001) and size ≥ 10 mm (OR: 3.8, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with malignancy.

conclusionWhile most GBPs are benign, a significant proportion carry malignant potential, particularly sessile polyps ≥ 10 mm. Improved risk stratification based on morphology and size is essential to guide management. Development of standardized follow-up protocols and refinement of imaging criteria are warranted.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyGallbladder DiseasesGallbladder NeoplasmsPolypsAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidental FindingsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesAdenomatous polypsCholecystectomyCholesterol polypsGallbladder polypsPrecancerous lesionsSessile morphology

Identifiers

PMID41212446
PMCPMC12602617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.