Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41212419›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Development of a patient decision aid (PDA)for patients undergoing breast reconstructive surgery: towards shared decision-making.

Dinesh Baithma Jothi, Mee Hoong See, Jing Hui Ng, Suniza Jamaris, Siti Zubaidah Sharif, Ping Yein Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dinesh Baithma JothiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Mee Hoong SeeBreast and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. meehoong@ummc.edu.my.
Jing Hui NgBreast and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Suniza JamarisBreast and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Siti Zubaidah SharifBreast and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Hospital Queen Elizabeth 2, 88300, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Ping Yein LeeUMeHealth Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pylee@um.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study developed a decision aid (DA) for Malaysian breast cancer survivors considering breast reconstruction post-mastectomy. The DA aims to improve patient engagement and decision-making, addressing the lack of resources for non-Western populations and providing women with the knowledge and confidence needed for personalized and satisfactory treatment decisions.

methodsThe DA utilized Kelly's framework for the development and testing of our decision aid for women considering breast reconstruction post-mastectomy. The DA was developed and evaluated in two phases. The first phase included the development of the DA with input and review by a multidisciplinary panel of experts and healthcare professionals. The second phase involved assessment of the finalized PDA for feasibility and acceptability within the target demographic, utilizing pre- and post-exposure questionnaires to gauge its impact on participants' decision-making processes.

resultsThe phase 1 results of the study indicate that the DA has been positively accepted, with the majority of health experts and patients rating the provided information as good or excellent. The results also showed decisional conflict decreased significantly (p < 0.001), and knowledge increased significantly (p < 0.001) among participants from before using the DA to 2-3 weeks after its use.

conclusionsOur DA is feasible and acceptable to women considering breast reconstruction. Furthermore, the DA effectively reduces decisional conflict and increases knowledge about breast reconstruction. The DA is an appropriate tool to be used in addition to standard care in women considering breast reconstruction.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDecision Making, SharedDecision Support TechniquesMammaplastyPatient ParticipationAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalaysiaMastectomyMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancerBreast reconstructive surgeryDecisional conflict scalePatient decision aidPreparation for decision-making scale

Identifiers

PMID41212419
PMCPMC12602598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.