ReviewJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2025
Ethnic-Racial Disparities in Food Environments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Inequities in Food Access and Availability.
Review in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food literacy interventions to improve sustainability in multicultural diets: a scoping review.Public health nutrition · 2026Article
- Inequalities in access to food in Brazil: a scoping review with a racial and gender focus and policy recommendations.Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ethnic-racial disparities in food environments contribute to food insecurity and diet-related health inequities. This systematic review and meta-analyses aimed to assess ethnic-racial inequities in the community and consumer food environments worldwide. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and LILACS databases were searched for studies published from inception to September 17, 2025. A total of 109 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 87.1% conducted in the United States. Findings indicated that Blacks were disproportionately affected by food deserts and food swamps, with lower availability of supermarkets and healthy food stores and greater exposure to unhealthy food retailers and advertising. Latinos/Hispanics and Indigenous/Natives also faced disadvantages, including higher exposure to unhealthy food outlets and increased likelihood of living in food deserts. Asians showed mixed results, with greater access to grocery stores but higher exposure to unhealthy food environments. In the meta-analysis, ethnic-racial minorities were 70% more likely to reside in food deserts (Pooled OR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.17-2.45), and food deserts [Pooled Mean Difference (MD): 3.63; 95% CI: 1.44-5.81] and food swamps had higher proportion of ethnic-racial minorities (Pooled MD: 2.02; 95% CI: 0.09-3.96) than non-food deserts and non-food swamps, respectively. These findings highlight structural inequalities shaping food environments and the urgent need for policies addressing food access disparities. Future research should expand beyond the U.S. and adopt standardized methodologies to better understand global ethnic-racial food environment disparities and their health implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41212385What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.