Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41212385›Full record

ReviewJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2025

Ethnic-Racial Disparities in Food Environments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Inequities in Food Access and Availability.

Elma Izze da Silva Magalhães, Dafne Pavão Schattschneider, Emanuele Bottega de Vargas, Lauren Yurgel da Silva, Daniely Casagrande Borges, Willian Luiz da Conceição, Marcos Fanton, Raquel Canuto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elma Izze da Silva MagalhãesDepartment of Collective Health, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000, Camobi, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9909-9861
Dafne Pavão SchattschneiderPostgraduate Program in Food, Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2400, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0201-206X
Emanuele Bottega de VargasPostgraduate Program in Food, Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2400, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1932-6771
Lauren Yurgel da SilvaPostgraduate Program in Food, Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2400, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-566X
Daniely Casagrande BorgesPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2400, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2790-2357
Willian Luiz da ConceiçãoPostgraduate Program in Food, Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2400, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0100-0080
Marcos FantonPostgraduate Program in Philosophy, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000, Camobi, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5360-3647
Raquel CanutoPostgraduate Program in Food, Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2400, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil. raquelcanuto@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4042-1913

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 306656/2022-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 3077799303285490Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88881.691318/2022-01Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 21/2551-0002066-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethnic-racial disparities in food environments contribute to food insecurity and diet-related health inequities. This systematic review and meta-analyses aimed to assess ethnic-racial inequities in the community and consumer food environments worldwide. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and LILACS databases were searched for studies published from inception to September 17, 2025. A total of 109 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 87.1% conducted in the United States. Findings indicated that Blacks were disproportionately affected by food deserts and food swamps, with lower availability of supermarkets and healthy food stores and greater exposure to unhealthy food retailers and advertising. Latinos/Hispanics and Indigenous/Natives also faced disadvantages, including higher exposure to unhealthy food outlets and increased likelihood of living in food deserts. Asians showed mixed results, with greater access to grocery stores but higher exposure to unhealthy food environments. In the meta-analysis, ethnic-racial minorities were 70% more likely to reside in food deserts (Pooled OR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.17-2.45), and food deserts [Pooled Mean Difference (MD): 3.63; 95% CI: 1.44-5.81] and food swamps had higher proportion of ethnic-racial minorities (Pooled MD: 2.02; 95% CI: 0.09-3.96) than non-food deserts and non-food swamps, respectively. These findings highlight structural inequalities shaping food environments and the urgent need for policies addressing food access disparities. Future research should expand beyond the U.S. and adopt standardized methodologies to better understand global ethnic-racial food environment disparities and their health implications.

Indexed as

EthnicityEthnic-racial disparitiesFood environmentRaceRacism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.