Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Lung ultrasound for predicting surfactant administration in ventilated and non-ventilated infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter prospective study.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surfactant retreatment in very preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: an observational cohort study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Lung ultrasound for neonatal respiratory distress in a resource-limited county hospital: a pilot study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to assess the utility of lung ultrasound (LUS) aeration score in predicting the need for surfactant administration in preterm infants based on surfactant deficiency and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) severity, including its usefulness in mechanically ventilated infants. We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study. Preterm infants with respiratory distress were enrolled. LUS aeration scores were assigned based on a 6-zone system (maximum score: 18). Surfactant administration was based on stable microbubble rating and chest radiography. Infants were stratified into mechanical ventilation (MV) and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) groups for analysis. Among 206 preterm infants, 80 were managed with MV and 126 with NIPPV, with surfactant administered to 48 and 27 infants, respectively. In the MV group, the LUS aeration score predicted surfactant administration with an area under the curve of 0.975 (cutoff 9; sensitivity 97.9%; specificity 96.9%). In the NIPPV group, the area under the curve was 0.915 (cutoff 8; sensitivity 84.6%; specificity 89.0%). LUS aeration score was significantly correlated with stable microbubble rating (Kendall's τ-b = - 0.529, P < 0.001) and chest radiographic severity (Kendall's τ-b = 0.535, P < 0.001). The oxygen saturation/inspired oxygen fraction ratio improved significantly after surfactant administration in both groups.
conclusionLUS aeration score can be valuable in predicting the need for surfactant administration, even in management strategies based on surfactant deficiency and RDS severity. Furthermore, the LUS aeration score aids in predicting the need for surfactant administration in ventilated infants. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Lung ultrasound (LUS) aeration score can predict the need for surfactant in continuous positive airway pressure management, where surfactant is administered based on inspired oxygen fraction threshold. WHAT IS NEW: • LUS aeration score is useful in managing patients receiving mechanical ventilation where surfactant administration is based on surfactant deficiency and respiratory distress syndrome severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41212310What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.