ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of crural reinforcement with bio-a
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of mesh reinforced cruroplasty with Phasix™ ST vs. Bio-AHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Intraoperative FLIP to guide revisional hiatal hernia repair: early experience and outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Postoperative quality of life after minimally invasive repair of giant hiatal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Reflections on surgery for hiatal hernia.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbsorbable synthetic meshes have gained increasing acceptance for crural reinforcement during hiatus hernia (HH) repair because their safety profile and the potential of reducing recurrence rates. Bio-A
aimCompare safety, efficacy, recurrence rates, and quality of life after laparoscopic HH repair and cruroplasty reinforced with either Bio-A
methodsRetrospective multicenter study (September 2011- December 2024). All patients that underwent minimally invasive HH repair with Phasix-ST
resultsOverall, 271 patients were included. Bio-A
conclusionsThis study shows that Bio-A
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.