ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Radiological assessment of patellar instability: comparative analysis of patients with and without instability and the impact of patellar stabilisation surgery.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patellar maltracking with dynamic MRI: clinical feasibility and diagnostic utility.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Introduction to the special issue on imaging of the knee.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatellar instability (PI) is a clinical diagnosis often complicated by symptom overlap with other knee pathologies and spontaneous relocation of the patella. Anatomical variations are key risk factors, highlighting the role of radiological investigations in assessing underlying pathology. Inconsistent measurement parameters and limited comparative data reduce diagnostic reliability. This study aimed to compare radiological parameters between patients with and without PI, and to assess how these parameters change following patellar stabilisation surgery.
methodsThis case-control study compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray radiological parameters between patients with recurrent PI and controls. Pre- and postoperative imaging was analysed in the PI group. Eleven validated radiological measurements, including patellofemoral joint angles and patellar height indices, were evaluated.
resultsFifty-five knees in the PI group and 50 knees in the Control group were analysed. Preoperatively, significant differences were found for all patellar height indices (p < 0.001) and patellofemoral measurements (p < 0.05), except for the congruence angle. Postoperatively, all patellar height measurements improved in the PI group (p < 0.05), with only the sulcus angle improving (p = 0.005) for patellofemoral measurements. Significant differences were observed between MRI and X-ray measurements (p < 0.05).
conclusionRadiological parameters differ significantly between unstable and stable knees, with improvement following surgery. Patellar height was the most consistent marker of instability. Discrepancies between MRI and X-ray findings suggest a need for modality-specific normative values. These results reinforce the value of radiological assessment in PI and support standardisation to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.