Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41212207›Full record

SynthesisWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026

Prevention of burnout syndrome in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lea Krebs, Laura Jung, Jasmin Arrich

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lea KrebsKlinik für Unfall,- Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Laura JungKlinik für Notfallmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Jasmin ArrichUniversitätsklinik für Notfallmedizin, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20/6D, 1090, Wien, Austria. jasmin.arrich@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-2334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians are at high risk of developing burnout and several studies have evaluated burnout prevention programs. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of burnout prevention programs and to evaluate whether one approach is superior to other programs. PATIENTS, MATERIAL AND

methodsThe methods were based on the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews. We searched the literature in five medical databases from October 2019 to June 2022. We included randomized controlled trials that examined the effect of burnout prevention programs on physicians.

resultsA total of 22 studies were included in our analysis, with 20 studies targeting individual interventions and 2 studies targeting structural interventions. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) or similar programs were the most common interventions. The main analysis showed a significant reduction of burnout in the intervention groups with an standardised mean difference (SMD) of -0.32 (95% confidence interval, CI: -0.41 to -0.22), which suggests a small to moderate effect. MBSR did not appear superior to other interventions in the subgroup analysis SMD -0.25 (95% CI: -0.48 to -0.02) versus SMD -0.61 (95% CI: -1.19 to 0.03). DISCUSSION: This analysis shows that individual burnout prevention programs may reduce burnout rates in physicians; however, the effect was relatively small. The effect was reduced even further when removing studies causing severe heterogeneity and those with a high risk of bias. Future research programs should focus on structural programs that address the lack of mentoring, rising administrative tasks, or long working hours, which may be more effective in reducing burnout in physicians.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalPhysiciansHumansMindfulnessRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDepression and anxietyFatigueIntervention studiesOccupational healthStress

Identifiers

PMID41212207
PMCPMC12992466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.