Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41212195›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2026

Diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance urography in pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: evaluating changes in anteroposterior diameter of the renal pelvis following furosemide administration.

Charlotte Grognet, Héloïse Lerisson, Daniela Rapilat, Nathalie Boutry, René-Hilaire Priso, Dyuti Sharma, Arthur Lauriot Dit Prevost, Philippe Puech

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlotte GrognetDepartment of Pediatric Imaging, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France. charlotte.grognet@chu-lille.fr.
Héloïse LerissonDepartment of Pediatric Imaging, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
Daniela RapilatDepartment of Pediatric Imaging, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
Nathalie BoutryDepartment of Pediatric Imaging, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
René-Hilaire PrisoDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
Dyuti SharmaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
Arthur Lauriot Dit PrevostDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Avenue Eugène Avinée, 59000, Lille, France.
Philippe PuechDepartment of Genitourinary and Women's Imaging, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Rue Michel Polonowski, 59000, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance urography (MRU) with diuretic injection is increasingly used to evaluate pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction, providing anatomical and functional information without ionizing radiation.

objectiveTo analyze the increase in anteroposterior diameter of the renal pelvis following furosemide injection during MRU to determine a diagnostic cutoff. To assess whether this increase supports etiological diagnosis and whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reliably detects crossing vessels. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively included all children who underwent surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction at our institution between January 2010 and January 2023 and had preoperative MRU. For each patient, the increase in renal pelvis diameter after furosemide injection during MRU was measured on the obstructed and contralateral healthy sides. Measurements were compared to determine a pathological cutoff. The change in renal pelvis diameter was also compared according to etiology (intrinsic vs. extrinsic). The association between crossing vessels identified on MRI and intraoperative findings was also assessed.

resultsSeventy patients (median age 9) were included. The increase in renal pelvis diameter was significantly greater on the obstructed side compared to the contralateral side (P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff for predicting obstruction was 6 mm (sensitivity 68.6%, specificity 87.1%). No significant difference was found in the change in renal pelvis diameter according to etiology (P = 0.86). The association between crossing vessels identified on MRI and during surgery was significant (P < 0.001).

conclusionAn increase greater than 6 mm in renal pelvis diameter after furosemide injection during MRU could represent an additional diagnostic criterion for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Indexed as

DiureticsFurosemideKidney PelvisMagnetic Resonance ImagingUreteral ObstructionUrographyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolContrast MediaFemaleHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaDiureticsFurosemideChildMagnetic resonance urographyRenal pelvisUreteropelvic junction obstruction

Identifiers

PMID41212195
PMCPMC12881078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.