ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2025
Treatment Survival and Reasons for Discontinuation in Patients with Recalcitrant Folliculitis Decalvans.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the risk of scarring and the psychological impact on affected patients, folliculitis decalvans (FD) requires prompt and focused care to control inflammation and prevent disease progression. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive long-term evaluation of treatment outcomes in difficult-to-treat cases of FD by analysing the effectiveness of various therapies and identifying reasons for treatment switches or discontinuation. The single-centre, retrospective cohort study collected information on patient characteristics and management strategies, focusing on different treatment groups and reasons for discontinuation or switching. Eighteen patients with biopsy-confirmed FD were included in the study because of their recalcitrant course (38.9% females, median age 33.0 years), with a median follow-up period of 1.5 years. During the study period, all patients received at least one pre-scription for topical therapies, primarily non-antibiotic disinfectants, topical corticosteroids, topical antibiotics, and topical dapsone. Systemic antibiotics were prescribed for 88.9% of patients, predominantly tetra-cyclines and a combination of rifampicin and clindamycin. Non-biological systemic therapies, excluding steroids, were used in 61.1% of patients, with isotretinoin being the most common (27.8%). Among immunomodulatory drugs, apremilast was prescribed to 11.1% of patients. Overall, the highest treatment discontinuation rates were observed with systemic antibiotics (risk ratio: 1.63; 95% confidence interval: 1.46-1.82), followed by systemic steroids. The treatment of patients with severe FD requires a personalized, multifaceted approach, typically involving a combination of local and systemic therapies. Antibiotics are often used as a first-line treatment, but they are associated with a high rate of discontinuation. This highlights the urgent need for effective immunomodulatory treatments, either as alternatives or as adjuncts to current options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.