ArticleBMJ public health2025
Governance for public health across health and allied sectors: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strengthening tobacco control enforcement in Nigeria: a policy and regulatory analysis supporting an expanded mandate for NAFDAC.BMC public health · 2026Article
- From disease-specific control to system-embedded governance: a multidimensional policy design analysis of stroke prevention and stroke center development in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Imagining Genomics and Population Health in 2050: Anticipating Future Research, Policy, and Governance Needs.Public health genomics · 2026Article
- Safe harboring and governance: Lakota relational systems as context for women's health integration.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- Assessing National Health Research System in a resource-limited setting: Insights from Indonesia.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: This study elucidates the status of public health governance, defines the concept and synthesises the evidence to guide stakeholders in enhancing governance for the delivery of essential public health functions (EPHFs). Design: A scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Data sources: A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature was performed using PubMed and Embase for English-language publications from 2000 to April 2025, supplemented by a grey literature search. Eligibility criteria: We included literature addressing public health governance and institutional arrangements. We excluded documents focusing solely on disease-specific and clinical governance, and governance at supranational level. Extraction and synthesis: Data from 177 included documents were extracted and analysed to identify definitions, components, actors, enablers and principles relevant to public health governance. Findings were complemented by WHO's experiences to develop an operational definition and framework. Results: Findings revealed the absence of a standardised definition of public health governance and highlighted the diversity of actors within and across health and allied sectors. Findings identified strategy and policy development, oversight, partnership, legal authority, resource stewardship, and monitoring and evaluation as key components of public health governance; legislation, financing, institutional structures and political will as key enablers; and integration, comprehensiveness with equity and shared responsibility as key principles. Four institutional models were identified: autonomous public health bodies, semi-autonomous bodies under health ministries, public health departments within ministries and interministerial platforms without a designated institute. Conclusion: Despite differences in institutional structures, successful delivery of the EPHFs depends on clearly defined roles and effective coordination across sectors. Government-led reviews and reforms are needed urgently to strengthen public health governance through institutional clarity, sustained investment and cross-sectoral collaboration for building resilient, trusted and equitable systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.