Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41211583›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Governance for public health across health and allied sectors: a scoping review.

Sohel Saikat, Redda Seifeldin, Yu Zhang, Maryjane Nweje, Sabrina Shivji, Gerard Schmets, Neil Squires, Anne-Catherine Viso, Duncan Selbie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sohel SaikatPrimary Health Care and Essential Public Health Functions, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0952-6036
Redda SeifeldinPrimary Health Care and Essential Public Health Functions, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6374-0880
Yu ZhangPrimary Health Care and Essential Public Health Functions, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3708-2321
Maryjane NwejePrimary Health Care and Essential Public Health Functions, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sabrina ShivjiPrimary Health Care and Essential Public Health Functions, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2340-0050
Gerard SchmetsSpecial Programme on Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Neil SquiresInternational Association of National Public Health Institutes (IANPHI), Berlin, Germany.
Anne-Catherine VisoSanté publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Duncan SelbieInternational Association of National Public Health Institutes (IANPHI), Berlin, Germany.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study elucidates the status of public health governance, defines the concept and synthesises the evidence to guide stakeholders in enhancing governance for the delivery of essential public health functions (EPHFs). Design: A scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Data sources: A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature was performed using PubMed and Embase for English-language publications from 2000 to April 2025, supplemented by a grey literature search. Eligibility criteria: We included literature addressing public health governance and institutional arrangements. We excluded documents focusing solely on disease-specific and clinical governance, and governance at supranational level. Extraction and synthesis: Data from 177 included documents were extracted and analysed to identify definitions, components, actors, enablers and principles relevant to public health governance. Findings were complemented by WHO's experiences to develop an operational definition and framework. Results: Findings revealed the absence of a standardised definition of public health governance and highlighted the diversity of actors within and across health and allied sectors. Findings identified strategy and policy development, oversight, partnership, legal authority, resource stewardship, and monitoring and evaluation as key components of public health governance; legislation, financing, institutional structures and political will as key enablers; and integration, comprehensiveness with equity and shared responsibility as key principles. Four institutional models were identified: autonomous public health bodies, semi-autonomous bodies under health ministries, public health departments within ministries and interministerial platforms without a designated institute. Conclusion: Despite differences in institutional structures, successful delivery of the EPHFs depends on clearly defined roles and effective coordination across sectors. Government-led reviews and reforms are needed urgently to strengthen public health governance through institutional clarity, sustained investment and cross-sectoral collaboration for building resilient, trusted and equitable systems.

Indexed as

Public HealthPublic Health PracticeScoping Review

Identifiers

PMID41211583
PMCPMC12593447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.