ArticleHealth science reports2025
Utilization and Dose Optimization of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Heart Failure Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Cross Sectional Study on Implications for Guideline-Targeted Therapy.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are well established in reducing morbidity and mortality among patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Evidence has consistently supported the use of high-dose ACEI therapy, which is recommended to optimize clinical outcomes and enhance patients' quality of life. Suboptimal utilization and under-dosing of these agents are associated with increased rates of hospitalization, worsening symptoms of heart failure, and overall, poor prognoses. We assessed the utilization and dose optimization of ACEIs in heart failure patients at the Adult University Teaching Hospital (AUTH). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among adult patients with with a confirmed diagnosis of CHF and an ejection fraction of < 40%. A checklist was used to collect data, which was subsequently analysed using STATA version 15.1. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine associated factors. Results: Of the 292 study participants, 209 (71.6%) were on ACEIs, with Enalapril being the only drug in use. The study found that only 42 (14.6%) of the patients were taking the optimum doses. The adjusted logistic regression model revealed that New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II (AOR: 3.1, CI: 1.20-8.01, Conclusion: Although the majority of patients were receiving ACEIs, only a small proportion of these were using optimal dosages. Therefore, a multidisciplinary team approach that includes clinical pharmacists in the medication review and patient monitoring processes would achieve definite outcomes in patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.