ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Surgical outcomes of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using fulcrum bending radiographs to determine curve rigidity.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal curve flexibility can be assessed reliably by fulcrum bending (FB) radiograph for surgical planning. However, it remains unknown how curve correctability of rigid curves are different from flexible curves. This study aims to investigate the relationship of curve flexibility and surgical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, to investigate for any differences of surgical outcomes in rigid and non-rigid curves, and to explore whether postoperative changes were different in rigid curves. Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with AIS, aged ≤18 years and underwent posterior spinal fusion with >2 years of postoperative follow-up at two affiliated hospitals between 2010 and 2022. Radiographic parameters were collected, including coronal Cobb angle of major curve, curve type, FB flexibility, fusion length, and implant density. Relationship of flexibility and correction rate was tested. Rigid curves (FB flexibility <50 %) were compared with non-rigid curves, in terms of curve correction rate, FB correction index (FBCI) and loss of correction at postoperative 2 years. Results: A total of 190 patients (83.7 % females) were included. Preoperative major curve was 60.2° (SD 10.9°) with 64.4 % (SD 17.2 %) flexibility, 21.6 % (n = 41) of the patients had rigid curves. FB flexibility correlated with curve correction rate (immediate postoperative Conclusion: Spinal curve flexibility significantly correlated with curve correction rate and FBCI. Rigid curves demonstrated ∼70 % correction rate, all with FBCI >100 %, indicating curve correction achieved more than estimated preoperatively. Despite rigid curves had lower curve correction rate, correction lost at 2-year follow-up was comparable between rigid and non-rigid curves.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.