ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2025
Interdisciplinary management of vaginismus: Case series on psycho-behavioral interventions by mental health and gynecological teams.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaginismus, categorized under Cases: Five women (ages 22-35) with lifelong or acquired vaginismus, diverse comorbidities (e.g., dysthymia, childhood trauma, infertility distress), and delayed help-seeking due to the sociocultural barriers were managed through an interdisciplinary model. Gynecological assessments ruled out organic causes, followed by psychiatric evaluation, and tailored interventions: pharmacotherapy (Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), duloxetine, propranolol), psychoeducation, cognitive-behavioral techniques (Jacobson's relaxation, sensate focus), and vaginal dilator therapy. Joint sessions with spouses and graded desensitization were emphasized. Outcomes were tracked over 3-8 months. All patients achieved successful penetrative intercourse and reported improved psychological well-being. Key facilitators included spousal support, trauma-informed therapy, and combined psychiatric-gynecological care. Interventions reduced anticipatory anxiety, resolved pelvic floor dysfunction, and restored marital harmony. Two patients conceived post-treatment. Conclusion: Interdisciplinary collaboration between mental health and gynecological teams is critical for managing vaginismus, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where stigma delays care. The case series highlights the need for enhanced training of gynecologists and mental health professionals to recognize and manage vaginismus as a treatable disorder rather than a taboo subject. This patient series adds to the limited literature on vaginismus from LMICs and serves as an educational resource for clinicians and trainees encountering female sexual dysfunctions in similar sociocultural settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.