Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41211473›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2025

Investigating the Effects of Valence, Arousal, Concreteness, and Humor on Words Unique to Singapore English.

Cynthia S Q Siew, Feria Chang, Jin Jye Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cynthia S Q SiewDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3384-7374
Feria ChangDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9171-7863
Jin Jye WongDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3248-4942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Singapore English is a dialect of English spoken by individuals living in Singapore, whose colloquial form (i.e., Singapore Colloquial English) contains unique lexical items not found in dominant dialects of English. The absence of these items from the lexicon of dominant English dialects indicates that lexical-semantic and affective norms central to psycholinguistic research do not exist for these Singapore English concepts, and it is unclear what is the specific influence of these effects when processing Singapore Colloquial English words. The present paper describes the development of valence, arousal, concreteness, and humor norms for a core vocabulary list of approximately 300 words and concepts, via human ratings and probing a Large Language Model, and evaluates the contribution of these norms to account for lexical processing performance in a visual lexical decision task. Results indicated that valence, arousal, and concreteness explained additional variance over and above orthographic similarity and word frequency in the visual lexical decision task. Specifically, Singapore English words that were more positively valenced, highly arousing, and more concrete, were responded to more rapidly and accurately. In addition, although there was generally a high convergence of valence, arousal, and concreteness ratings across human raters and the Large Language Model, humor norms were much less closely aligned. Overall, this paper provides a case study of how psycholinguistic research can be extended to diverse, understudied dialects of English, and showcases how doing so offers an opportunity for psycholinguistics to examine the importance of various lexical-semantic and affective measures to quantify lexical information in colloquial, informal language.

Indexed as

affective normsarousalconcretenesshumorlexical-semantic normsSingapore Englishvalencevisual lexical decision

Identifiers

PMID41211473
PMCPMC12594081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.