ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Intra-tumor and peritumoral radiomics and deep learning based on ultrasound for differentiating fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumor: a multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and validate an integrated intra-tumoral (ITR) and peritumoral (PTR) radiomics-deep learning model based on ultrasound (US) imaging for accurately differentiating fibroadenomas (FA) from phyllodes tumors (PT) and further classifying PT into benign, borderline, and malignant subtypes. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 300 patients (141 FA, 159 PT) from three institutions. US images were analyzed using manual segmentation of ITR and PTR (4mm, 8mm, 12mm, 16mm expansions). A total of 114 radiomics features were extracted per region using PyRadiomics. Five deep learning models (CNN, MLP, ViT, GAN, RNN) and six machine learning classifiers were evaluated. Optimal features were selected via LASSO and Boruta algorithms. Integrated models combining radiomics (ITR ± PTR) with clinical factors (diameter, Bi-RADS) were developed. Performance was assessed using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and biopsy reduction rate. Internal validation used a 7:3 random split stratified by center and pathology. External validation was performed on a per-center hold-out basis. Results: The combined model (ITR + 8mm PTR + clinical) achieved the highest performance for FA/PT differentiation (AUC: 0.960; accuracy: 96.0%; sensitivity: 96.0%; specificity: 94.5%). For PT subtyping (benign/borderline/malignant), the model attained an AUC of 0.874 (accuracy: 77.2%). The integrated model significantly reduced unnecessary biopsy rates by 11.7% overall (18.1% for PT cases). Peritumoral analysis (8mm PTR) contributed critically to model performance, likely capturing stromal interactions at the tumor periphery. Conclusion: Integrating intra-tumoral, peritumoral (8mm), and clinical US radiomics features enables highly accurate non-invasive differentiation of FA and PT and stratification of PT subtypes. This approach reduces diagnostic ambiguity in Bi-RADS 4 lesions and decreases unnecessary biopsies, demonstrating significant clinical utility for precision diagnosis of breast fibroepithelial tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.