SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025
Nirsevimab for preventing respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infections in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Systematic Review: Efficacy, Safety Profile, and Cost-Effectiveness of Nirsevimab Versus Palivizumab for RSV Prevention in Children Under 24 Months.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in infants, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. Nirsevimab, a long-lasting monoclonal antibody, has been demonstrated to reduce RSV-related outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world settings. The object was to review the existing real-world evidence (RWE) on the effectiveness of nirsevimab in preventing RSV-LRTIs. Methods: Searches of six databases in addition to trial registries, HTA/regulatory agency webpages and conference abstracts were conducted in November 2024. Observational studies evaluating nirsevimab prophylaxis in infants during their first RSV season or high-risk infants in their second season were included. For outcomes evaluated by more than one study, feasibility assessment was conducted and, where appropriate, studies were combined in meta-analyses. Results: Sixteen studies reporting effectiveness outcomes were included. The studies were conducted across four countries (Spain, Italy, US and France), and included 141,550 infants. Nirsevimab showed significant effectiveness for preventing RSV-LRTI hospitalization (reduction in risk from hazard ratios and odds ratios of 84.5%; 95% CI: 73.6%-90.9%; Conclusions: Real-world evidence confirms the effectiveness of nirsevimab against RSV-LRTIs and underlines the public health impact of the intervention in preventing RSV-related health outcomes. There is no clear evidence that effectiveness differs for infants born in season (at birth immunization) compared with out of season groups, or that effectiveness varies in preterm infants compared to healthy term infants. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024591323.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.