ReviewInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Effectiveness of Clear Aligner Therapy in Orthodontic Management for Children with Mixed Dentition: A Scoping Review.
Review in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of clear aligner mandibular advancement versus traditional functional appliances for skeletal Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Children Undergoing Removable Orthodontic Treatment.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and background: Clear aligners have become a popular orthodontic treatment option due to their esthetic appeal. However, their efficacy in managing malocclusions during mixed dentition, a developmental stage involving both primary and permanent teeth, has not been fully explored. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of clear aligners in treating malocclusions in mixed dentition and compares them to traditional orthodontic methods such as fixed appliances and myofunctional devices. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Studies examining the use of clear aligners in mixed dentition were retrieved from four major databases. The inclusion criteria focused on studies that compared clear aligners with other orthodontic treatments. A total of 21 relevant studies were included in the analysis. Results: The reviewed studies primarily assessed Invisalign® clear aligners for treating class II, open bite, and dental crowding in mixed dentition. Treatment durations varied between 6 and 18 months. While clear aligners were effective in correcting dentoalveolar issues, their impact on skeletal changes was less significant compared to traditional methods like the twin block appliance. The clear aligners provided notable benefits in terms of patient comfort, compliance, and esthetics. Conclusion: Clear aligners present a viable treatment option for correcting malocclusions in mixed dentition, particularly for dentoalveolar adjustments. However, for skeletal changes, traditional appliances like fixed devices may be more effective. Clear aligners should be considered for patients seeking esthetic and comfortable orthodontic treatment. Clinical significance: Clear aligners offer a noninvasive, comfortable, and esthetic solution for orthodontic treatment in mixed dentition. They can be particularly beneficial for mild to moderate malocclusions, though careful patient selection is crucial for optimal outcomes. How to cite this article: Rai K, Kote AR, Priya K,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.