ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Hall Technique Compared to Orthodontic Band Cementation in Carious Injuries in Deciduous Teeth of Children with Disabilities: Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim and background: The aim is to evaluate the longevity of the Hall Technique (HT) compared to orthodontic bands (BOCIV) for treating carious lesions in the deciduous molars of children with disabilities. Materials and methods: A total of 58 children with cognitive impairments, diagnosed with mild to moderate learning disabilities, aged 4-10 years, presenting with carious lesions classified as scores 5/6 in deciduous molars, were included. The sample consisted of 100 teeth, divided into two groups: HT, Results: After 12 months, 72 teeth were reevaluated. A total of 100 teeth were reevaluated at least once during the study and included in the survival analysis. HT showed superior performance (88% survival) compared to the BOCIV (66% survival). Regarding marginal adaptation, BOCIV showed a higher frequency of subgingival extension, whereas the HT group exhibited better proximal contact preservation. Conclusion: Orthodontic bands cemented with conventional glass ionomer (BOCIV) may be considered an alternative treatment for extensive carious lesions in deciduous molars; however, HT demonstrated superior survival, marginal adaptation, and proximal contact retention. Clinical significance: This study highlights a treatment option for these carious lesions in deciduous molars for children with disabilities. The study was registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC) under the number RBR-825qxqw. How to cite this article: Pedroza ACBB, Gimenez T, Resende CS,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.