ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
Changes in Sleep Quality and Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain Managed in Primary Care Physiotherapy.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the association between change in sleep quality over a 3-month period and the overall perceived effect of treatment, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life up to 12-month follow-up. Patients and methods: This longitudinal study included 997 individuals (mean age 49.7 years, 72.1% women) with musculoskeletal pain who sought care from a physiotherapist in primary health care in Norway. Postoperative patients were excluded. We used a Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model to calculate adjusted risk ratios (RRs) for the probability of a positive treatment outcome at 6 and 12 months, associated with categories of good and poor sleep reported at first encounter and after three months. Results: Compared with those who reported poor sleep quality over the first three months, those who reported improved sleep quality had a greater probability for a positive perceived effect of treatment (relative risk 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.37-2.00), low pain intensity (RR:1.71; 95% CI:1.34-2.19), and high health-related quality of life (RR:2.06; 95% CI:1.55-2.75) at 12 months. Those who reported good sleep quality over the 3-month period had similar probabilities of positive treatment outcomes as those who reported improved sleep quality. Conclusion: Individuals who reported improved sleep quality during the first three months after the first consultation with a physiotherapist in primary care had a substantially higher probability of positive treatment outcomes up to 12 months, compared with those who had poor sleep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.