ArticleNeurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)
Brain aging among individuals with trigeminal neuralgia.
Article in Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a complex orofacial neuropathic pain condition with limited understanding of underlying mechanisms and therapeutic options. Emerging evidence suggests the involvement of the brain in persons with TN including widespread brain changes when employing a widely used brain aging biomarker that estimates a predicted brain age difference or brain age gap. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to assess the predicted brain age difference (brain-PAD) or brain age gap across two TN subtypes (classical TN, and secondary/idiopathic TN) in comparison with age-and sex-matched pain-free controls and its association with several clinical and psychological characteristics. Thirty-four individuals diagnosed with Classical TN, 17 diagnosed with secondary/idiopathic TN were age- and sex-matched to pain-free controls (n = 54). All participants underwent a T1 brain MRI and completed clinical and psychological measures. There were significant differences in brain-PAD among TN subtypes (ANCOVA p = 0.0078, effect size f
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.