ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture for paralytic ileus in severe stroke: a protocol of multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Paralytic ileus is a frequent and serious complication of severe stroke, associated with poor prognosis and prolonged hospitalization. Current pharmacological options are limited by side effects and uncertain efficacy. Although electroacupuncture has shown promise in improving gastrointestinal motility, high-quality trials specifically targeting stroke-related paralytic ileus are still lacking, leaving an important evidence gap. Methods: This multicenter randomized controlled trial will recruit at least 100 severe stroke patients with paralytic ileus across China. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to an electroacupuncture or sham electroacupuncture group. The electroacupuncture group will receive standardized electroacupuncture, while the sham electroacupuncture group will undergo sham acupuncture without electrical stimulation. The primary outcome is weekly spontaneous bowel movements. Secondary outcomes include bowel movement regularity, abdominal circumference, bowel sounds, emergency medication use, Glasgow Coma Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Modified Rankin Scale and length of hospitalization. Adverse events will be systematically monitored and recorded throughout the study. Efficacy will be assessed using linear mixed-effects models or generalized linear mixed models, with both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses performed. Discussion: The results of this multicenter RCT will provide robust evidence on the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture for stroke-related paralytic ileus and may inform future clinical practice and guideline development. Clinical trial registration: https://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/, identifier ITMCTR2025000003.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.