ArticleCureus2025
Enhancing Documentation Standards of Complications in Informed Consent for Neck of Femur Fracture Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Neck of femur (NOF) fractures are a major cause of morbidity in the United Kingdom. Operative management is the standard of care, and informed consent is essential to ensure patients understand potential benefits and complications arising during the surgical management of NOF fractures. This study aimed to assess and enhance the quality of Consent Form 1 documentation of complications of NOF fracture surgery as per the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and to assess improvements following focused interventions. Methodology A closed-loop audit was conducted in the Trauma and Orthopaedic Department, Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, from February to October 2024. In the first cycle, we analyzed the Consent Form 1 retrospectively for the documentation of complications. Interventions for improvement were performed, including teaching sessions and posters on consent documentation. The second cycle assessed post-intervention practice. The study encompassed patients with capacity who underwent fixation, hemiarthroplasty, or total hip replacement (THR). Documentation was considered complete if it included all common, less common, and rare complications. Results The initial documentation rates were modest, with fewer than 50% of forms recording pain, catheterization, avascular necrosis, hip stiffness, limb length discrepancy, and mortality. Post-intervention improvements were observed, including pain, avascular necrosis, and death for NOF fixation, alongside better values of infection, altered wound healing, pulmonary embolism, and bone damage for hemiarthroplasty. For THR, improvements were seen in the documentation of bleeding, dislocation, blood clots, prosthetic wear, infections, altered wound healing, bone damage, and death. Conclusions Targeted teaching and visual reminders improved documentation, but there are persistent gaps. Further strategies are required to standardize consent practices and ensure complete patient information in line with BOA guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.