ArticleThe East African health research journal2025
Evaluating the Knowledge and Practices of General Practitioners in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment at Three Referral Hospitals in Bujumbura, Burundi.
Article in The East African health research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) encompass a range of non-communicable conditions that share a common pathophysiological process related to atherosclerosis. Currently, CVD are the leading cause of death worldwide, with an estimated 17.9 million deaths attributed to these conditions in 2019. In Africa, the burden of CVD is steadily increasing, leading to a rise in years lived with disability. In Burundi, however, cardiovascular diseases are poorly documented, and there is a lack of data on the extent to which general practitioners (GPs) assess cardiovascular risk among their patients. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and practices of GPs regarding global cardiovascular risk assessment, providing evidence to inform policymakers and training institutions on potential strategies for improving cardiovascular care. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in three national hospitals in Burundi: Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bujumbura (CHUK), Hôpital Prince Régent Charles (HPRC), and Hôpital Militaire de Kamenge (HMK), all located in Bujumbura capital city. Study participants were general practitioners working in the outpatient departments of these hospitals. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire, and descriptive statistics were generated to analyse the findings. The level of knowledge regarding cardiovascular disease was assessed based on scoring systems derived from the questionnaire. The study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Burundi. Results: The participation rate was 86.8%, with 66 participants out of 76 completing the study. Among respondents, 68% had less than five years of professional experience. Only 40.9% demonstrated adequate knowledge of cardiovascular disease, and a mere 18.18% possessed sufficient knowledge of therapeutic objectives and treatment strategies. In practice, 77.3% of participants reported routinely assessing cardiovascular risk; however, 42% of those in need of lipid-lowering therapy did not prescribe such medications, highlighting gaps between clinical practice and guideline adherence. Conclusions: Identified gaps in the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of general practitioners concerning cardiovascular disease prevention highlight the need for decision-makers, training institutions, and universities to prioritise the development of ongoing in-service training programmes to enhance their capacity in this area.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.