ArticleThe East African health research journal2025
Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes Between Open Herniotomy and Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Among Pediatric Patients with Inguinal Hernias: A Five-Year Retrospective Review at Tanzania's National Hospital.
Article in The East African health research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robotic and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Africa: Current Adoption, Challenges, and Future Horizons.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inguinal hernias (IH) are common congenital anomalies in children, requiring surgical repair to prevent complications. The primary methods for repairing pediatric IH are laparoscopic hernia repair (LHR) and open herniotomy (OH). However, there is limited evidence comparing postoperative outcomes between these approaches in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes between OH and LHR among pediatric patients treated at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH) in Tanzania. Methodology: This 5-year retrospective comparative cohort study included 156 pediatric patients under 14 years who underwent OH or LHR at MNH from January 2019 to December 2023. Participants were selected using a hybrid random-consecutive sampling technique. LHR and OH patients were recruited at approximately a 1-to-4 ratio. Data was collected from patient records and via phone interviews. Inferential statistical tests were used to compare the outcomes of the two surgical methods. Results: Participants had a median age of 19.5 months (IQR 10-36) at presentation, with the majority being male (142, 91%). The median age was slightly higher in the LHR group [21.5 (IQR 12-46.5)] compared to 19 months (IQR 9-36) in the OH group. In the subgroup analysis of bilateral hernias (n=22), measures such as the duration of surgery, postoperative length of stay, total hospitalization time, parents` satisfaction, and cosmetic rating favored LHR ( Conclusion: While LHR demonstrated shorter operative time, faster recovery, and favourable cosmetic outcomes, the potential for hernia recurrence warrants careful consideration when selecting the surgical approach. Given the inherent methodological limitations, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, the findings provide valuable preliminary evidence that can inform future larger-scale, well-powered studies aimed at evaluating the long-term outcomes of LHR in LMIC settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.