ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Identification of the key aroma-active compounds in wolfberry (
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine-learning-assisted screening of key flavor compounds in pumpkins.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- From Whole-Plant Phytochemistry to Precision Oncology: A Paradigm-Shifting Systematic Review ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying the key aroma-active compounds in wolfberry pulp is essential for ensuring product quality. In this study, the key odorants in fresh wolfberry pulp (FWP), dried wolfberry pulp (DWP) and mixed wolfberry pulp (MWP) were systematically characterized using sensory evaluation, comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-TOFMS), gas chromatography-mass spectrometer-olfactometry (GC-MS-O), and headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS). A total of 58 odorants were detected across the three samples, exhibiting flavor dilution (FD) factors ranging from 1 to 243, while 33 odorants showed odor activity values (OAVs) greater than 1. Data analysis identified hexanal, (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.