ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Impact of intracoronary adenosine on the no-reflow phenomenon: A randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distal Versus Proximal Intracoronary Drug Delivery for the Treatment of the No-Reflow Phenomenon During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Predictive value of frontal QRS-T angle for no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute coronary syndrome.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The no-reflow phenomenon occurs in 5 % to 50 % of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), leading to suboptimal myocardial reperfusion and poor outcomes. Although intracoronary adenosine has shown benefits in studies, its use remains controversial. This analysis aims to evaluate the impact of intracoronary adenosine administration on preventing NRP during PPCI. Methods: In this randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 240 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI were divided into two cohorts, one receiving a bolus dose of intracoronary adenosine and the other receiving 5 cc of saline as a placebo before stenting. The primary endpoint was the incidence of NRP measured by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade and frame count. Secondary endpoints included ST-segment resolution after 90 min, left ventricular ejection fraction, and major adverse cardiac events after 40 days. Results: Among 240 STEMI patients, adenosine did not significantly reduce angiographic no-reflow compared with placebo (TIMI flow grade ≤ 2: 15 % vs. 19.2 %, Conclusion: Prophylactic intracoronary adenosine did not significantly reduce angiographic no-reflow in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI but was associated with greater left ventricular functional recovery at 40 days. These findings suggest a cardioprotective effect of adenosine on the microvasculature and myocardial tissue, supporting its potential role as an adjunctive therapy in STEMI management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.