ArticleCase reports in psychiatry2025
Quetiapine Extended-Release and Peripheral Edema: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Case reports in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic, is widely prescribed for psychiatric disorders, particularly schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depressive disorders with or without psychotic symptoms. While edema is more commonly associated with olanzapine and clozapine amongst second general antipsychotics, reports involving quetiapine-particularly the extended-release (XR) formulation-are rare. We describe the case of a 52-year-old woman with severe major depressive episode with psychotic features who was initiated on escitalopram and quetiapine immediate-release (IR) 100 mg/day, later switched to quetiapine XR 100 mg/day to improve adherence and reduce sedation. Ten days after the switch, she developed symmetrical bilateral lower limb pitting edema without systemic symptoms. Comprehensive cardiac, renal, hepatic, thyroid, and immunologic evaluations were unremarkable, and venous Doppler ruled out deep vein thrombosis. The edema resolved within 10 days of discontinuing quetiapine XR and recurred upon rechallenge. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Score was 9, indicating a probable to definite association. Possible mechanisms include α1-adrenergic blockade, 5-HT2 receptor antagonism, and pharmacokinetic differences in XR formulations leading to sustained peripheral receptor occupancy. Literature review reveals few comparable reports, most involving higher doses or polypharmacy. This case highlights the importance of clinician awareness of quetiapine XR-associated edema, even at low doses, and supports dechallenge-rechallenge as a useful diagnostic approach to improve patient safety and adherence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.