ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2025
Enhancing home rehabilitation through AI-driven virtual assistants: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Rehabilitation for War-Related Polytrauma: A Narrative Review of Multidimensional Strategies and Implementation Challenges.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Digital Transformation of Rehabilitation Medicine: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Innovations, Clinical Integration, and Future Paradigms.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Review
- Vestibular Rehabilitation for Post-Concussive Vestibular Dysfunction: Pathophysiology, Evidence-Based Practice, and Future Perspectives.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Novel Technology and the Internet of Medical Things.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and spinal cord injury: current status, emerging technologies, and ethical perspectives.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven virtual physiotherapy assistants (VPAs) are increasingly adopted in home-based rehabilitation, offering real-time feedback and personalised guidance through wearable sensors. These systems enhance treatment adherence, minimise clinic visits, and improve rehabilitation outcomes. However, challenges such as sensor accuracy, patient engagement, and affordability hinder widespread implementation. This review explores current applications, benefits, and limitations of AI-driven VPAs. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases. Search terms such as: "artificial intelligence", "virtual physiotherapy assistants", "home rehabilitation", and "wearable sensors". From 847 initially identified articles, 31 peer-reviewed publications (2018-2024) met inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria eliminated non-English publications, conference abstracts, and studies without AI components. The review synthesised literature on sensor accuracy, AI-based monitoring algorithms, and patient engagement strategies. Key Content and Findings: Analysis of 31 studies revealed that AI-driven VPAs enhance adherence and reduce in-person visits. Integrating wearable sensors and AI facilitates real-time feedback and personalised support, improving exercise accuracy. Critical limitations include inertial measurement unit drift, electromyography sensor placement variability, and optical system environmental dependencies. Challenges remain in sensor precision, user motivation, cost barriers, and technology accessibility. Novel findings highlight potential for predictive analytics, gamification strategies, and telehealth integration. Conclusions: AI-driven VPAs offer a promising accessible, personalised home-based rehabilitation solution. Evidence demonstrates therapeutic potential, though systematic addressing of sensor accuracy, engagement strategies, and accessibility barriers is essential for implementation. Technological improvements and increased affordability are crucial for broader adoption and long-term impact on rehabilitation delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.