ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Disease Progression Modeling and Stratification for detecting sub-trajectories in the natural history of pathologies: Application to Alzheimer's disease trajectory modeling.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying the progression of degenerative diseases remains crucial for early diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. However, accurately modeling disease biomarker evolution is hindered by substantial variability in disease trajectories among individuals, driven by demographic, genetic, and lifestyle factors. This variability gives rise to heterogeneous phenotypic manifestations, underscoring the need for stratification based on underlying disease subtypes. Recent advances have shown promise in unsupervised stratification of disease trajectories. Yet, current approaches face significant challenges related to robustness, biomarker specificity, interpretability, and temporal resolution of clustering results. To address these challenges, we introduce Disease Progression Modeling and Stratification (DPMoSt), a new probabilistic model designed to optimize clusters of continuous trajectories along a long-term disease time axis. This approach allows for the determination of subtype-specific biomarkers, improving the accuracy of patient stratification and generalization on external cohorts. We demonstrate DPMoSt on both synthetic and real-world data for the modeling of Alzheimer's disease (AD) evolution. In the synthetic experiments, DPMoSt shows high accuracy in reconstructing trajectory subtypes and identifying the biomarkers' specificity for the clustering problem. Our experiments in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset demonstrate the ability of DPMoSt to identify AD subtypes associated with accelerated cognitive decline and higher prevalence of the APOE4 variants. This result was validated on the external memory clinic cohort of the Geneva University Hospitals, confirming the association between cognitive decline and APOE4 in the pathological subtype. These results highlight the robustness of DPMoSt as well as its potential for broader applicability, offering a powerful tool for studying disease progression and subtype differentiation across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.