ArticleGastroenterology research2025
Enabling Drug-Induced Liver Injury Surveillance Through Automated Medication Extraction From Clinical Notes: A Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV Real-World Large Language Models Validation Study.
Article in Gastroenterology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models in hepatology: A systematic review.Hepatology forum · 2026Review
- Future burden of MASLD in the United States: A state-level forecasting study, 2022-2050.Hepatology forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) presents a significant diagnostic challenge, often leading to delayed detection. Unstructured clinical notes contain comprehensive medication data vital for DILI surveillance but are difficult to analyze systematically. Large language models (LLMs) show promise for automated extraction but require real-world clinical data validation to assess feasibility for clinical applications like DILI surveillance. Methods: We retrospectively validated an LLM system on 100 randomly sampled Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) discharge summaries. Gold standard unique medication lists were derived via manual annotation and manual deduplication based on normalized drug names. LLM outputs underwent identical deduplication. Performance was assessed using precision, recall, and F1-score comparing deduplicated lists. MIMIC-IV data use agreement (DUA) compliance was ensured. Results: Comparison yielded a precision of 0.85, recall of 1.00, and an F1-score of 0.92 for unique medication identification. The 174 false positives resulted from parsing or normalization errors; no medication hallucinations occurred. A subsequent DILI database lookup failed for approximately 6.2% of correctly identified unique medications, evaluated as a separate feasibility measure. Conclusions: The LLM demonstrates high accuracy and perfect recall for unique medication extraction and identification from complex clinical notes, establishing technical feasibility. This represents a feasible and possible integration of LLM towards developing automated tools for enhanced DILI surveillance and improved patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.