ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2025
Generating implementation evidence in clinical trials of vaccines and immunization-related technologies to reduce evidence-to-policy delays.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence-to-policy delays pose a significant threat to the timely adoption of novel vaccine products despite their proven efficacy. Understanding the "how to" (i.e., implementation aspects) of innovative vaccine products can facilitate decision-making to fast-track prioritization and introduction. This perspective highlights the need to integrate implementation research within clinical trials of vaccines and immunization-related technologies to facilitate the generation of policy-relevant implementation evidence. We argue that implementation context, mechanisms, strategies, adaptation, and transportability should be systematically reported alongside efficacy outcomes to support decision-makers in informing policies regarding their use in routine settings. We propose a framework for embedding implementation research in vaccine development and advocate for stronger collaborations between research teams and policymakers. The success of implementation research within clinical trials of vaccine products depends on interdisciplinary expertise, proactive decision-maker engagement, and adherence to relevant implementation science reporting guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.