ArticlemHealth2025
Development and validation of an online tool for assessing dietary intake, diet quality, and environmental impact in Mexico.
Article in mHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tools assessing diet composition, diet quality, and environmental impact are essential for promoting sustainable diets. However, no such tools currently exist in the Mexican context. The objective of this article was to develop and validate Nutriecology Methods: The software was developed using the waterfall life cycle methodology and a multi-stage process. It included a 24-hour recall, a validated and adapted Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), and an automatic WF assessment. The Alternate Mexican Diet Quality Index (IACDMx) was also included to evaluate diet quality. The IACDMx was adapted from the Mexican Diet Quality Index (ICDMx) to reflect sustainable consumption patterns. The tool's accuracy was evaluated through two studies: (I) by comparing an FFQ and a 24-hour recall in 174 Mexican adults (18-74 years); (II) by comparing 2 FFQs and 24-hour recalls in a period of 6 months in 87 Mexican young adults (18-35 years). Validation was done through Spearman correlations and Bland-Altman analyses. Results: Nutriecology Conclusions: Nutriecology
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.