ArticlemHealth2025
Exploring health literacy, perceived needs, information preferences and acceptability of smartphone-based messaging interventions among individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea in Hong Kong: a mixed-method approach.
Article in mHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The role of technology in disease management has gained significant attention, mobile health technology for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remains underdeveloped, with limited research exploring its applications. This study explored OSA individuals' health literacy, perceived needs for improvement, information preferences, and acceptance of smartphone-based messaging interventions. Methods: The study comprised two parts. Part 1 was a cross-sectional, self-administered online survey using non-probability convenience sampling conducted in the inpatient ward and outpatient clinic of Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, from May to July 2020. The questionnaire assessed health literacy, perceived needs, and views on smartphone-based messaging interventions to enhance self-management of OSA. Written consent was obtained, and the survey took approximately 10 minutes to complete. Part 2 involved a focus group interview in August 2020 with nine randomly selected participants from Part 1, exploring their views on perceived needs and smartphone-based messaging interventions. Results: A total of 108 participants (82% men; 40.7% aged ≥60 years) were included. Participants self-reported their OSA severity as mild (21.3%), moderate (17.6%), and severe (23.1%), while 38% were unaware of their severity. The results showed low OSA-related health literacy among participants, with no significant differences by age or years since diagnosis. Most participants (76.8%) expressed a strong desire to improve their health. High demand for OSA-related information was reported, including sleep quality (83.3%), OSA-related knowledge (82.4%), weight control (81.5%), habit improvement (78.7%), and emotional management (66.7%). The messaging intervention was well accepted, with high feasibility (82.4%) and usability (72.2%). Conclusions: This study highlights low OSA-related health literacy and a strong demand for authoritative health information. Most found that the messaging intervention was feasible and useful in improving health-related habits and OSA management. The study underscores the need for tailored health education, personalized interventions targeting perceived needs, and innovative messaging solutions to enhance treatment adherence and self-management in OSA individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.