ArticlemHealth2025
Maintained effectiveness of a smartphone-based chatbot coach (BalanceUP) for mental well-being in headache sufferers: preliminary findings from a single-arm 6-month follow-up study.
Article in mHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Behavioral interventions delivered by smartphones have been proven effective in improving physical and mental well-being in clinical and non-clinical samples. However, it remains unclear whether improvements are sustained after intervention completion. This single-arm study evaluated the sustained effectiveness of BalanceUP, a smartphone-based coaching intervention delivered by a conversational agent (CA), for people suffering from frequent headaches. Methods: Following a randomized controlled trial, where an intervention group was compared with a waitlist control group, this within-group comparison examined follow-up results of all participants who participated in the coaching program. Measurements were taken pre-, post-, and 6 months after intervention start. Changes in the primary outcome mental well-being [Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS)] and secondary outcomes (psychosomatic symptoms, stress, headache-related self-efficacy, intention to change behavior, presentism, absenteeism, pain coping) were analyzed using repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Cohen's d. Additionally, baseline predictors of improvement were explored. Results: Of 179 headache sufferers who started coaching [mean age 39.2 years, standard deviation (SD) 11.8 years; 157/179, 87.7% women], 117 (65.4%) completed the intervention and 67 (36.3%) provided 6-month follow-up data. Improvements in mental well-being were maintained at follow-up with a medium effect size (Cohen d=-0.54). Secondary outcomes also showed sustained improvements with effects ranging from small to medium (d=-0.24 to 0.70), including depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, perceived stress, headache management self-efficacy, application of behavior change techniques, absenteeism/presentism, as well as pain coping skills. Higher baseline stress and presenteeism were associated with greater improvements in well-being. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest the potential for CA-delivered coaching to support improvements in mental well-being and psychological functioning over time. However, the uncontrolled study design, attrition at follow-up, and other methodological limitations require cautious interpretation of the findings. More methodologically robust controlled studies are essential to establish the sustained effectiveness of digital behavioral interventions before drawing definitive conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.