Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210975›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Added value of serum proteins to clinical and ultrasound information in predicting the risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors.

An Coosemans, Jolien Ceusters, Chiara Landolfo, Thaïs Baert, Kainat Jamil, Wouter Froyman, Ruben Heremans, Gitte Thirion, Sandra Claes, Julie Oosterlynck and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

An CoosemansDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jolien CeustersDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Chiara LandolfoDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thaïs BaertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kainat JamilDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wouter FroymanDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ruben HeremansDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gitte ThirionDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sandra ClaesDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy (Rega Institute), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Julie OosterlynckDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Roxanne WoutersDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ann VankerckhovenDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Francesca MoroDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Floriana MasciliniDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Adam NeumannGynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Anne-Sophie Van RompuyDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dominique ScholsDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy (Rega Institute), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jaak BillenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Toon Van GorpDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ignace VergoteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tom BourneDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Caroline Van HolsbekeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Valentina ChiappaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonia TestaDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Daniela FischerovaGynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dirk TimmermanDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ben Van CalsterDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa (ADNEX) is the best-performing model to estimate the risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors. We assessed the incremental value of serum proteins over ADNEX predictors in an exploratory multicenter study. In a cohort of 932 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery, 33 serum proteins were preoperatively quantified using multiplex high-throughput and electrochemiluminescence immunoassays. Using multivariable logistic regression, ADNEX predictors alone had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.93) to discriminate benign from malignant tumors. This AUC increased most after adding HE4 (+0.03) or CA125 (+0.02). CA72.4 increased AUCs to discriminate secondary metastatic tumors from benign (+0.03), borderline (+0.03), and stage I tumors (+0.03). CA15.3 increased AUCs to discriminate borderline tumors from stage I (+0.01) and stage II-IV tumors (+0.03). While CA125 and HE4 had the highest added value over ADNEX predictors, CA72.4 and CA15.3 may improve discrimination between malignant subtypes.

Indexed as

Oncology

Identifiers

PMID41210975
PMCPMC12595006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.