ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
A microbiota-based perspective on urinary stone disease: insights from 16S rRNA sequencing and machine learning models.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The gut-kidney microbiome-oxalate axis in calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis: mechanisms and microbiome-based interventions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Multi-habitat microbiome profiling identifies habitat-dependent alterations and complementary discriminatory information in urolithiasis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative genomic analyses provide new insights into phylogenetic and functional diversification in genusFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Preoperative gut microbiota combined with machine learning for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urinary stones are a multifactorial disease. In recent years, the role of microorganisms in its pathogenesis has attracted considerable attention. Although studies have suggested that certain microbes present in the gut and urine are associated with the formation of urinary stones, the current criteria for stone classification are not rigorous enough. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the gut and urinary microbiota composition via 16S rRNA sequencing in patients with pure CaOx, pure UA, and pure Inf stones. By integrating these microbiota data with clinical data, we constructed machine learning models and evaluated their diagnostic value in distinguishing stone types. Methods: A total of 81 patients with urinary stones (including 30 with pure CaOx stones, 31 with pure UA stones, and 20 with pure Inf stones) and 26 healthy volunteers were enrolled. Stool and urine samples were collected from each participant and subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing to obtain microbiota data and characterize the gut and urinary microbiota profiles of patients with different stone types. We further integrated microbiota and clinical data, such as age, gender and BMI, using LASSO feature selection and six machine learning algorithms (e.g. SVM, Random Forest and XGBoost) to create prediction models for stone type. Model performance was evaluated through cross-validation. Results: Results showed enrichment of Conclusion: This study reveals that different types of stone are characterized by distinct compositions of microbiota. Machine learning models based on microbiota and clinical data can predict urinary stone types noninvasively. This provides novel insights into the microecological mechanisms of urinary stones and opens up new avenues for clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.