ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2025
Family and teachers lead the way: How different information sources about COVID-19 influenced children's well-being during the pandemic.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study evaluates how children's information needs about COVID-19 during the pandemic were met through various channels, including family, peers, teachers, social media, and news outlets. By examining differences across countries, the research aims to be informative for public health practitioners involved in managing and delivering public health services during an emergency. Study design: Utilizing data from the International Survey of Children's Well-Being (ISCWeB), the study analyzes responses from 25,184 children in urban schools across 22 countries. It explores the impact of different information sources on children's well-being. Methods: Separately for each country and at the individual level of analysis, the study regresses variables related to COVID-19 information sources, support structures, information processing, demographics, online access, and first-hand pandemic experiences on children's subjective well-being. A structural interaction matrix assesses the combined effects of the information sources, while elastic net regression is employed to enhance interpretability and contain multicollinearity issues. Results: The impact of various information sources on children's well-being varied significantly by country. Family and teachers were identified as the most positively influential sources across countries, while the effects of peers, social media, and news were more mixed. Conclusion: The findings offer actionable insights for public health practitioners, underscoring the importance of choosing appropriate channels for delivering information to children based on their cultural contexts. Family and teachers are identified as key influencers across different countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.