Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210921›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025

Harmonizing 10,000 connectomes: site-invariant representation learning for multi-site analysis of network connectivity and cognitive impairment.

Nancy R Newlin, Michael E Kim, Praitayini Kanakaraj, Elyssa McMaster, Chloe Cho, Chenyu Gao, Timothy J Hohman, Lori Beason-Held, Susan M Resnick, Sid E O'Bryant and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Nancy R NewlinVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3714-4684
Michael E KimVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3562-2688
Praitayini KanakarajVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Elyssa McMasterVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1297-8898
Chloe ChoVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5114-001X
Chenyu GaoVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-3035
Timothy J HohmanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3377-7014
Lori Beason-HeldNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Susan M ResnickNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Sid E O'BryantUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Institute for Translational Research, Fort Worth, Texas, United States.
Nicole PhillipsUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Institute for Translational Research, Fort Worth, Texas, United States.
Robert C BarberUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Institute for Translational Research, Fort Worth, Texas, United States.
David A BennettRush University Medical Center, Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Lisa L BarnesRush University Medical Center, Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Sarah BiberUniversity of Washington, National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, Seattle, Washington United States.
Sterling JohnsonUniversity of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Derek ArcherVanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Zhiyuan LiVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6361-3191
Lianrui ZuoVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5923-9097
Daniel MoyerVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5733-2127

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne Pettigrew · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
MRI markers of brain aging and risk factors for cognitive decline in older African AmericansR01AG056405 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BARNES, LISA L · 2018 to 2023
$3.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056405NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Data-driven harmonization can mitigate systematic confounding signals across imaging cohorts caused by variance in scanners and acquisition protocols. As diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data are often acquired with different hardware and software, harmonization is essential for integrating these scattered datasets into a cohesive analysis for improved statistical power. Large-scale, multi-site studies for Alzheimer's disease (AD), a neurodegenerative condition characterized by high data variability and complex pathology, pose the challenge of both site-based and biological variation. Approach: We learn lower-dimensional representations of structural connectivity invariant to imaging cohort, geographical location, scanner, and acquisition factors. We design a conditional variational autoencoder that creates latent representations with minimal information about imaging factors and maximal information related to patient cognitive status. With this model, we consolidate 9 cohorts and 35 unique imaging acquisitions (for a total of 38 imaging "sites") into a cohesive dataset of 6956 persons (16.4% with mild cognitive impairment and 10.7% with AD) imaged for 1 to 16 sessions for a total of 11,927 diffusion-weighted imaging sessions. Results: These site-invariant representations successfully remove significant ( Conclusions: The proposed model yields reproducible precision across 15 data configurations. This approach demonstrates the effectiveness of representation learning in enhancing biological signals by mitigating acquisition-specific confounding factors in neuroimaging studies.

Indexed as

brain networksconnectomicsdiffusion imagingmachine learningmulti-site

Identifiers

PMID41210921
PMCPMC12594104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.