ArticleEJHaem2025
Radiologic Pseudoprogression Associated With a Positive Response in a Patient With Multiple Myeloma Treated With a BCMA×CD3 Bispecific Antibody: A Case Report.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic effects of elranatamab and Juzentaihoto, Japanese traditional herbal medicine, in triple-class-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease: a case report.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Teclistamab for multiple pulmonary lesions in extramedullary myeloma: first successful case and review of the literature.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Pseudoprogression of extramedullary lesions during elranatamab therapy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudoprogression is characterised by an increase in tumour size, driven by an influx of inflammatory cells, followed by regression. This phenomenon has rarely been reported in multiple myeloma (MM), despite increased use of immunotherapy approaches that have been associated with pseudoprogression in other malignancies. We report a case of pseudoprogression in a female in her early seventies with relapsed/refractory MM who was treated with the BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody linvoseltamab. At study Day 28, she was hospitalised with acute bone pain and a new fracture, and a positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan suggested disease progression. However, biochemical markers of disease burden (serum M-protein, kappa light chain) had decreased from baseline, and therefore linvoseltamab was continued. At Day 77, M-protein was absent and the patient had achieved complete biochemical response, but she had to discontinue linvoseltamab due to infectious complications. A subsequent scan on Day 86 demonstrated marked improvement in osseous lesions. Despite being off therapy, the disease did not progress for 2 years. Assessment of T-cell activation and proinflammatory cytokine production indicated increased T-cell activation concurrent with onset of radiologic pseudoprogression. To our knowledge, this is the first description of radiologic pseudoprogression in MM with anti-BCMA bispecific antibody therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.