ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2025
Spinal cord morphology and PKD2L1
Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Morphometrical studies of the mouse spinal cord are often limited to one age or sex, restricting our understanding of anatomical variability. This study provides a detailed analysis of the spinal cord in mice, examining the effects of age, sex, and spinal region, along with the distribution of PKD2L1-positive (PKD2L1 Methods: Using 811 transverse sections from a total of 18 3- and 8-week-old mice, DAPI immunofluorescence and confocal imaging, 14 dimensions of gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and the central canal (CC) were assessed using landmarks positioning and segmentation methods. Results: Age was the most influential factor: between 3- and 8- weeks-old, the spinal cord showed reduced rostro-caudal length ( Discussion: These results indicate progressive structural changes during development, including reorganization of cells and CC architecture stabilization. The distribution of PKD2L1 Conclusion: This work provides detailed, segment-specific anatomical data crucial for developing accurate and physiological numerical models. Adding age and sex differences emphasizes the need to reflect biological variability in simulations. Additionally, the mapping of PKD2L1
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.