ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Breath biopsy biomarkers: cell-free nucleic acids in exhaled breath condensate.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consolidated Evidence and New Frontiers of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review.Cells · 2026Review
- Current Clinical Perspectives of Biomarkers in Respiratory Diseases: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Gene Expression Profiling of EGFR, FGFR2, PIK3CA, PTEN, SMAD4, STK11, and TP53 in Cell-Free RNA From Exhaled Breath Condensate: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Implications in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Respiratory Biomarkers: An Opportunity for Patient-Centric Microsampling Approach for Treatment Optimization.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Sputum Liquid Biopsy for Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Subtyping, Surveillance, Response Prediction, and Prognostication: A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) has emerged as a promising, organ-specific biofluid for non-invasive molecular diagnostics. While breath analysis has traditionally focused on volatile organic compounds (VOCs), recent advances have shifted attention toward non-volatile constituents, particularly cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) such as genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, mRNA, miRNA, long non-coding RNA, and microbial genetic material. These molecules reflect the respiratory tract biology and can serve as biomarkers for a range of clinical conditions, including lung cancer, obstructive lung diseases, infections, and potentially even systemic disorders. This review summarizes the current knowledge on cfNAs in EBC, highlighting technical challenges in sample collection and nucleic acid extraction. We provide a comparison of EBC collection devices, discuss optimization strategies for nucleic acid recovery, and examine emerging applications such as early cancer detection, treatment monitoring, infection diagnostics, and endotyping of chronic airway diseases. The feasibility of at-home EBC sampling with portable collection devices offers additional advantages, potentially overcoming logistical and psychological barriers that often delay clinical care. Although limitations remain, including low cfNA yield and lack of standardization, ongoing innovation in sampling and molecular techniques is rapidly expanding the translational potential of breath biopsy. With further development, EBC-based cfNA profiling may complement blood-based liquid biopsies and, in specific contexts such as lung cancer, provide additional organ-specific information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.