Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210852›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Breath biopsy biomarkers: cell-free nucleic acids in exhaled breath condensate.

Ondrej Pös, Jakub Styk, Monika Kubanova, Silvia Bokorova, Gergely Buglyo, Beata Soltesz, Peter Lukasz, Vladimir Benes, Vanda Repiska, Balint Nagy and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ondrej PösComenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Jakub StykComenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Monika KubanovaComenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Silvia BokorovaComenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Gergely BuglyoDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Beata SolteszDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Peter LukaszDepartment of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Vladimir BenesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Vanda RepiskaFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Biology, Genetics and Clinical Genetics, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Balint NagyDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Tomas SzemesComenius University Science Park, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) has emerged as a promising, organ-specific biofluid for non-invasive molecular diagnostics. While breath analysis has traditionally focused on volatile organic compounds (VOCs), recent advances have shifted attention toward non-volatile constituents, particularly cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) such as genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, mRNA, miRNA, long non-coding RNA, and microbial genetic material. These molecules reflect the respiratory tract biology and can serve as biomarkers for a range of clinical conditions, including lung cancer, obstructive lung diseases, infections, and potentially even systemic disorders. This review summarizes the current knowledge on cfNAs in EBC, highlighting technical challenges in sample collection and nucleic acid extraction. We provide a comparison of EBC collection devices, discuss optimization strategies for nucleic acid recovery, and examine emerging applications such as early cancer detection, treatment monitoring, infection diagnostics, and endotyping of chronic airway diseases. The feasibility of at-home EBC sampling with portable collection devices offers additional advantages, potentially overcoming logistical and psychological barriers that often delay clinical care. Although limitations remain, including low cfNA yield and lack of standardization, ongoing innovation in sampling and molecular techniques is rapidly expanding the translational potential of breath biopsy. With further development, EBC-based cfNA profiling may complement blood-based liquid biopsies and, in specific contexts such as lung cancer, provide additional organ-specific information.

Indexed as

breath biopsycell-free nucleic acidsexhaled breath condensate (EBC)liquid biopsylung cancer biomarkersobstructive lung diseases

Identifiers

PMID41210852
PMCPMC12593479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.