Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210799›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Revisiting H‑Bond

Nikki Williams, Tanay Parnaik, Saptarshi Dutta, Joseph Bergen, Mauricio Cattaneo, Giovanny A Parada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nikki WilliamsChemistry Department, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey 08628, United States.
Tanay ParnaikChemistry Department, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey 08628, United States.
Saptarshi DuttaChemistry Department, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey 08628, United States.
Joseph BergenChemistry Department, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey 08628, United States.
Mauricio CattaneoInstituto de Química Física, Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, INQUINOA (CONICET-UNT), Ayacucho 471 (4000), San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5598-0814
Giovanny A ParadaChemistry Department, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey 08628, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-8832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain the electrochemical proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) of arylenediamines upon weak base addition in aprotic media. Similar to quinone electrochemistry, endergonic deprotonation to form freely diffusing products is a central criterion used to exclude proton transfer. However, the second oxidation wave of arylenediamines shows large, chemically reversible

Identifiers

PMID41210799
PMCPMC12593132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.