ArticleACS omega2025
Benchmark Measurements for Energetic Salts: A Prerequisite toward Improved Estimation Methods for Lattice Enthalpy.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of the formation enthalpies of energetic salts is hampered by the inability of current procedures to provide reliable lattice enthalpies, partly due to the lack of reference benchmark values. In this context, we report the synthesis and characterization of twenty-one energetic salts, eight of which had never been described before. In addition to density and thermal stability, special care is devoted to the accurate measurement of formation enthalpy. By subtracting experimental formation enthalpies of the salts from the ab initio formation enthalpies of their constitutive ions, benchmark lattice enthalpies are obtained. On the basis of the resulting dataset, some limitations of the widely used volume-based thermodynamics (VBT) approach are highlighted, and a more physically sound alternative that does not involve any fitting parameter is put forward. The latter should be improvable through a more detailed description of the ions and possibly the introduction of a dose of empiricism that will be made possible by the future extension of the present database to include selected literature data and further measurements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.