ArticleACS omega2025
Experimental Analysis of Micro-Tribomechanical and Thermal Oxidation Properties of Ceramic-Reinforced Copper-Graphite Composites.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using the powder metallurgy process, this study focused on the impact of varying concentrations of SiC and graphite additions on microstructural, tribomechanical, and thermophysical properties. The resulting composites had a high relative density (>90%). The reinforcement particles exhibited a homogeneous distribution in the copper matrix. No compound developed between the reinforcing and copper phases. There was good interfacial bonding between the graphite and SiC structures. The composites' overall structural hardness increased by 1.04 to 1.25 times. From 1.13 to 1.40 times, the empirical elasticity modulus increased. With SiC and graphite reinforcement, wear resistance was increased 10-fold to 12-fold for the wear tests. Lean graphite reduced friction by around 2.4 times. The samples that were chosen based on their tribomechanical characteristics underwent oxidation testing. The application of graphite and SiC together resulted in a mere 2.5 times improvement in oxidation resistance, while bare SiC reinforcement enhanced it by almost 30 times compared to pure copper. Lean graphite and graphite added to the structure in combination with SiC had no discernible impact on oxidation resistance. For Cu matrix composites, the operating temperature was critical. Graphite-SiC reinforced samples demonstrated superior properties at temperatures below 300 °C, while lean SiC reinforced samples had superior tribomechanical properties at temperatures over 300 °C.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.