Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210606›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2025

Management of Prenatally Diagnosed Malformations of the Central Nervous System: Factors Influencing Decision-making and the Time of Termination of Pregnancy.

Christine Ibold, Massimiliano Lia, Holger Stepan, Renaldo Faber, Sabine Riße, Andreas Merkenschlager, Susanne Schrey-Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christine IboldGynäkologie, Sana Kliniken Leipziger Land, Borna, Germany.
Massimiliano LiaAbteilung für Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Holger StepanAbteilung für Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Renaldo FaberZentrum für Pränatale Medizin Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sabine RißeZentrum für Pränatale Medizin Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas MerkenschlagerNeuropädiatrie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Susanne Schrey-PetersenAbteilung für Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: CNS malformations are among the most common malformations diagnosed prenatally and one of the main reasons for late terminations of pregnancy. Making the correct diagnosis and prognostic counseling a33re complex. The aim of this study was to analyze pregnancy outcomes with regard to specific malformations, the factors which affect decision-making, and the time between diagnosis and termination as well as the causes of late diagnosis and late termination. Patients and Method: A retrospective examination was carried out of all pregnancies with fetal CNS malformations treated at a perinatal center between 2003 and 2014. Termination rates, type of malformation, and gestational age at initial diagnosis and at termination were recorded. The factors influencing decision-making and the time between diagnosis and termination were analyzed statistically. A case-by-case analysis was carried out of any terminations performed after week 26+0 of gestation. Results: In 139 of 251 cases (55.44%), the pregnancy was terminated between week 13+1 and week 38+2 of gestation (median: 22+4 GW). The median time from the initial diagnosis to the start of termination (Δtermination) was 10 days (range: 1 to 94 days). Relevant factors influencing the decision to terminate the pregnancy were the type of malformation compared to isolated ventriculomegaly (non-isolated ACC [aOR 17.5; p < 0.001], holoprosencephaly [aOR 24.4; p < 0.001], spina bifida [aOR 7.24; p < 0.001], other neural tube defects [aOR 62.5; p < 0.001]) and the presence of additional genetic anomalies (aOR 6.38; p = 0.014). The decision to terminate the pregnancy occurred less often when the diagnosis was made at or after week 22+0 of gestation (aOR 0.24; p < 0.001). Significant factors which affected the time between diagnosis and the start of termination (Δtermination) were: having a fetal MRI (HR 0.41; p = 0.003) and maternal age (HR 0.95 per additional year; p = 0.034). The interval between diagnosis and termination was significantly shorter if a destructive abnormality (HR 10.5; p = 0.004) or a (non-spina bifida) neural tube defect (HR 3.86; p = 0.002) was present. A known chromosomal aberration (p = 0.87), non-CNS anomalies (p = 0.58), or a diagnosis ≥ 22+0 GW (p = 0.74) affected the time between diagnosis and termination. The analysis of particularly late terminations from week 26+0 of gestation onwards found that avoidable delays in making the diagnosis or terminating the pregnancy only occurred in a few individual cases. Conclusion: The diagnostic and prognostic complexity of cerebral malformations means that delayed diagnosis and prolonged decision-making are common, even under optimal conditions of care. Early introduction of standardized prenatal diagnostic examinations is needed for to ensure that the pregnant woman receives open-ended, informed counseling as soon as possible. But late termination of pregnancy is not necessarily negative as, in most cases, this is due to the need for a differentiated prenatal diagnostic evaluation - for example, a fetal MRI - and the ethical requirement of sufficient time to provide informed, well-considered decision-making.

Indexed as

fetal CNS malformationfetal neural tube defectfetocidelate termination

Identifiers

PMID41210606
PMCPMC12591831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.