ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2025
Chimpanzee's in Black: Visual Search for the Conspecific Body Silhouette by Chimpanzees (
Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Like faces, we obtain various information from the body, such as species, individual identity, age, sex, action, and emotional state. Bodies are processed in a specialized manner, similar to faces. Furthermore, it is known that faces capture attention and cause efficient search in primates including humans (i.e., shallower response-time slopes with increasing set size). In this study we aimed to examine from a comparative cognitive perspective whether bodies have a similar effect. To this end, we conducted a visual search task using body silhouette stimuli with chimpanzees and humans as participants. The results showed that chimpanzees detected body silhouettes among a set of miscellaneous object silhouettes more quickly and accurately compared to the other stimulus categories. These results could not be explained by physical features such as pattern complexity and suggest that chimpanzees categorically perceive the bodies of their own species. In contrast, the body-specific inversion effect, which could be evidence for specialized processing of bodies, was not observed. Furthermore, in a generalization test using silhouettes of quadrupedal animals, which were novel but similar in pattern to chimpanzees, and silhouettes of humans, which were familiar but not quadrupedal, their performance was better with the silhouettes of quadrupedal animals than with the familiar human silhouettes. These findings contrast with those in humans, who efficiently searched for both chimpanzee and human silhouettes, and suggests species differences in the effect of familiarity (expertise).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.