Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210603›Full record

ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2025

Chimpanzee's in Black: Visual Search for the Conspecific Body Silhouette by Chimpanzees (

Masaki Tomonaga, Tomoko Imura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masaki TomonagaSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Human Environments, Matsuyama, Japan.
Tomoko ImuraFaculty of Integrated Arts and Social Sciences, Japan Women's University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9158-4512

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like faces, we obtain various information from the body, such as species, individual identity, age, sex, action, and emotional state. Bodies are processed in a specialized manner, similar to faces. Furthermore, it is known that faces capture attention and cause efficient search in primates including humans (i.e., shallower response-time slopes with increasing set size). In this study we aimed to examine from a comparative cognitive perspective whether bodies have a similar effect. To this end, we conducted a visual search task using body silhouette stimuli with chimpanzees and humans as participants. The results showed that chimpanzees detected body silhouettes among a set of miscellaneous object silhouettes more quickly and accurately compared to the other stimulus categories. These results could not be explained by physical features such as pattern complexity and suggest that chimpanzees categorically perceive the bodies of their own species. In contrast, the body-specific inversion effect, which could be evidence for specialized processing of bodies, was not observed. Furthermore, in a generalization test using silhouettes of quadrupedal animals, which were novel but similar in pattern to chimpanzees, and silhouettes of humans, which were familiar but not quadrupedal, their performance was better with the silhouettes of quadrupedal animals than with the familiar human silhouettes. These findings contrast with those in humans, who efficiently searched for both chimpanzee and human silhouettes, and suggests species differences in the effect of familiarity (expertise).

Indexed as

body perceptionchimpanzeessilhouettevisual search

Identifiers

PMID41210603
PMCPMC12594578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.