Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210596›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Comparison of deep learning-based segmentation and registration using pre-treatment contours for online rectal delineation in magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.

Iris D Kolenbrander, Koen M Kuijer, Mark H F Savenije, Gert J Meijer, Martijn P W Intven, Josien P W Pluim, Matteo Maspero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iris D KolenbranderIMAG/e Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Koen M KuijerDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mark H F SavenijeDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gert J MeijerDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martijn P W IntvenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Josien P W PluimIMAG/e Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Matteo MasperoDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Deep learning promises accurate target contouring for online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) in rectal cancer. However, delineating the mesorectal clinical target volume (CTV) remains challenging. Integrating planning-based contours, delineated offline before treatment, can provide anatomical shape and boundary information. This study evaluated deep learning-based segmentation and registration models to determine the optimal approach for incorporating planning contours into online rectal contouring. Materials and Methods: Deep learning-based segmentation and registration models, both U-Nets, were developed using MRI of 104 rectal cancer patients, split into 68, 14, and 22 training, validation, and testing subjects. The segmentation model used the planning CTV and daily fraction MRI, while the registration model used the planning MRI and CTV and the daily fraction MRI. The models were compared in terms of contour accuracy (maximum Hausdorff distance (HD), Dice, and a qualitative score) and robustness against domain shifts. Results: When incorporating the planning contour, the segmentation and registration models achieved comparable median HD values of 9.3 mm (interquartile range, IQR: 7.1-12.1) and 10.2 (8.2-12.4) (p=0.18), respectively. However, segmentation achieved lower HD values in the middle and cranial regions of the target (HD Conclusion: Deep learning-based segmentation was identified as the optimal approach for incorporating the planning CTV into online rectal delineation in MRgRT.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networksDeep learningOnline adaptive radiotherapyRegistrationSegmentationTarget contouring

Identifiers

PMID41210596
PMCPMC12590434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.