ArticleAdaptive behavior2025
Noisy Memory Generates Value in Changing Environments.
Article in Adaptive behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experimental data suggest that episodic memory is involved in sequential value-based decision-making. By contrast, standard computational models of decision-making assume that prior reward outcomes are integrated into subjective values rather than remembered discretely. Previous work developed a minimal computational framework for sequential value-based decision-making that is based on noisy sampling of episodic memories, rather than calculating value. We called these agents "Imperfect Memory Programs" (IMPs) and showed how their single free parameter optimizes the trade-off between the magnitude of error and the complexity of imperfect recall. Here, we develop biologically plausible approximations to the IMPs with lossy agents (LIMPs) that maintain only 1 bit of reward memory for binary outcomes but fail to encode rewards with some probability. Both IMPs and LIMPs perform similarly to or better than a simple agent with perfect memory in multiple classic decision-making tasks and generate phenomenology that resembles value-based computations. We find that allowing different encoding probabilities for rewards and omissions improves performance further and allows to trade-off matching versus maximizing behavior, as well as flexible versus stable performance. Together, these results suggest that episodic agents can approximate value-based agents through capitalizing on realistic encoding and/or sampling noise. This suggests that mnemonic errors (1) can improve, rather than impair decision-making and (2) provide a plausible alternative explanation for some behavioral correlates of "value".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.